2008 SEC Tempo-Free Stats

Through 2/27/08
2007 Stats


Offensive Stats

Tempo (possession per 40 minutes)

1. Tennessee	72.2
2. Ole Miss	69.4
3. Alabama	69.3
4. Arkansas	69.1
5. Florida	69
6. Vanderbilt	68.5
7. Auburn	68.3
8. Georgia	67.7
9. Mississippi State	66.7
10. LSU	66
11. South Carolina	64
12. Kentucky	63.1

Offensive Efficiency (points per possession)

1. Florida	1.11
2. Tennessee	1.11
3. Auburn	1.08
4. Mississippi State	1.05
5. Vanderbilt	1.05
6. South Carolina	1.04
7. Ole Miss	1.03
8. Arkansas	1.02
9. Kentucky	1.01
10. Alabama	1.01
11. LSU	0.98
12. Georgia	0.96

Effective FG %

1. Mississippi State	54.1%
2. Florida	53.3%
3. Auburn	51.7%
4. Vanderbilt	51.5%
5. Tennessee	51.2%
6. Arkansas	50.3%
7. Kentucky	50.2%
8. South Carolina	49.6%
9. Alabama	48.9%
10. Ole Miss	47.2%
11. LSU	45.7%
12. Georgia	45.3%

2-pt Shooting %

1. Florida	55.6%
2. Mississippi State	54.6%
3. Auburn	50.5%
4. Vanderbilt	50.2%
5. Alabama	49.5%
6. South Carolina	49%
7. Arkansas	48.9%
8. Kentucky	48.8%
9. Tennessee	48.5%
10. LSU	46.2%
11. Georgia	45.4%
12. Ole Miss	45.3%

3-pt Shooting %

1. Tennessee	37.1%
2. Kentucky	35.7%
3. Vanderbilt	35.6%
4. Auburn	35.6%
5. Mississippi State	35.5%
6. Arkansas	35.3%
7. Ole Miss	34.1%
8. South Carolina	33.6%
9. Florida	33%
10. Alabama	31.8%
11. Georgia	30%
12. LSU	29.8%

Turnover %

1. South Carolina	15.5%
2. Auburn	17.9%
3. Ole Miss	18.3%
4. Vanderbilt	18.4%
5. Tennessee	18.5%
6. Florida	18.8%
7. Alabama	19.1%
8. LSU	19.2%
9. Georgia	20.6%
10. Arkansas	20.7%
11. Kentucky	22.9%
12. Mississippi State	23.3%

Offensive Rebounding %

1. Ole Miss	36.7%
2. Tennessee	35.2%
3. Mississippi State	33.1%
4. Georgia	32.5%
5. Arkansas	32%
6. Florida	31.8%
7. LSU	31.7%
8. Alabama	30.9%
9. Kentucky	30.5%
10. Auburn	29.1%
11. South Carolina	28.3%
12. Vanderbilt	26.3%

Efficiency Margin

1. Tennessee	0.14
2. Mississippi State	0.09
3. Arkansas	0.05
4. Vanderbilt	0.04
5. Florida	0.03
6. Kentucky	0
7. Alabama	-0.03
8. Ole Miss	-0.05
9. Georgia	-0.06
10. South Carolina	-0.07
11. Auburn	-0.08
12. LSU	-0.08

Defensive Stats

Points per possession Allowed

1. Mississippi State	0.96
2. Tennessee	0.97
3. Arkansas	0.98
4. Kentucky	1.01
5. Vanderbilt	1.01
6. Georgia	1.02
7. Alabama	1.04
8. LSU	1.06
9. Florida	1.08
10. Ole Miss	1.09
11. South Carolina	1.11
12. Auburn	1.16

Effective Shooting % Allowed

1. Mississippi State	41.3%
2. Arkansas	45.5%
3. Kentucky	46.3%
4. Tennessee	47.8%
5. Vanderbilt	47.9%
6. LSU	50.6%
7. Alabama	50.7%
8. Ole Miss	51.7%
9. Georgia	52.3%
10. Florida	53.2%
11. South Carolina	53.3%
12. Auburn	58.6%

2-pt Shooting % Allowed

1. Mississippi State	39.6%
2. Kentucky	44.5%
3. Arkansas	44.8%
4. Vanderbilt	47.3%
5. LSU	47.9%
6. Alabama	48.2%
7. Ole Miss	50.2%
8. Tennessee	50.4%
9. South Carolina	52.8%
10. Florida	53%
11. Georgia	55.1%
12. Auburn	59%

3-pt Shooting % Allowed

1. Tennessee	28.7%
2. Mississippi State	29.8%
3. Arkansas	31.2%
4. Georgia	31.7%
5. Vanderbilt	32.7%
6. Kentucky	33.1%
7. Florida	35.7%
8. South Carolina	36%
9. Ole Miss	36.1%
10. Alabama	36.2%
11. LSU	37.3%
12. Auburn	38.6%

Turnover % Forced

1. Tennessee	23.1%
2. South Carolina	22.2%
3. Alabama	21.1%
4. Auburn	21%
5. Arkansas	19.6%
6. Florida	19.3%
7. Vanderbilt	18.7%
8. LSU	18.5%
9. Kentucky	18.4%
10. Georgia	17.7%
11. Ole Miss	17.2%
12. Mississippi State	16%

Defensive Rebounding %

1. Georgia	79.7%
2. Tennessee	76.4%
3. Alabama	74%
4. Ole Miss	73.5%
5. Florida	72.1%
6. Kentucky	72.1%
7. Arkansas	71.5%
8. Vanderbilt	70.6%
9. LSU	70.4%
10. Auburn	69.7%
11. Mississippi State	68.4%
12. South Carolina	62.2%