Big East 2008 Tempo-free Stats
Through 2/27/08
2007 Stats
Offensive Stats
Tempo (possession per 40 minutes)
| 1. Notre Dame | 72.7 |
| 2. Syracuse | 69.7 |
| 3. Seton Hall | 69.6 |
| 4. Marquette | 69.3 |
| 5. Villanova | 69.1 |
| 6. Connecticut | 67.3 |
| 7. DePaul | 67.2 |
| 8. Louisville | 67.1 |
| 9. Rutgers | 66.9 |
| 10. Providence | 66.8 |
| 11. St. John's | 65.4 |
| 12. West Virginia | 64.6 |
| 13. Cincinnati | 64.3 |
| 14. USF | 63.8 |
| 15. Pittsburgh | 63.5 |
| 16. Georgetown | 62.8 |
Offensive Efficiency (points per possession)
| 1. Notre Dame | 1.1 |
| 2. Connecticut | 1.09 |
| 3. Pittsburgh | 1.08 |
| 4. Marquette | 1.07 |
| 5. Louisville | 1.06 |
| 6. West Virginia | 1.06 |
| 7. Georgetown | 1.05 |
| 8. Seton Hall | 1.04 |
| 9. Providence | 1.03 |
| 10. Syracuse | 1.02 |
| 11. DePaul | 1.02 |
| 12. Villanova | 1.01 |
| 13. USF | 1.01 |
| 14. Cincinnati | 0.99 |
| 15. St. John's | 0.88 |
| 16. Rutgers | 0.88 |
Effective FG %
| 1. Louisville | 52.3% |
| 2. Georgetown | 52.2% |
| 3. Providence | 50.6% |
| 4. Notre Dame | 50.3% |
| 5. Connecticut | 50.1% |
| 6. Marquette | 49.7% |
| 7. Pittsburgh | 49.3% |
| 8. Cincinnati | 48.6% |
| 9. Seton Hall | 48.3% |
| 10. USF | 48% |
| 11. Syracuse | 47.7% |
| 12. DePaul | 47.7% |
| 13. West Virginia | 47.6% |
| 14. Villanova | 46.7% |
| 15. Rutgers | 45.4% |
| 16. St. John's | 42.4% |
2-pt Shooting %
| 1. Louisville | 53.5% |
| 2. Georgetown | 52.7% |
| 3. Syracuse | 49.7% |
| 4. Connecticut | 49.7% |
| 5. Pittsburgh | 48.9% |
| 6. USF | 48.3% |
| 7. Providence | 47.1% |
| 8. Marquette | 47.1% |
| 9. Cincinnati | 47.1% |
| 10. West Virginia | 46.8% |
| 11. DePaul | 46% |
| 12. Villanova | 45.8% |
| 13. Notre Dame | 45.7% |
| 14. Seton Hall | 45% |
| 15. Rutgers | 42.4% |
| 16. St. John's | 41.3% |
3-pt Shooting %
| 1. Notre Dame | 40.1% |
| 2. Providence | 37.8% |
| 3. Marquette | 36.4% |
| 4. Seton Hall | 36.4% |
| 5. Georgetown | 34.3% |
| 6. Connecticut | 34.3% |
| 7. Cincinnati | 34.3% |
| 8. DePaul | 34.1% |
| 9. Rutgers | 34.1% |
| 10. Louisville | 33.5% |
| 11. Pittsburgh | 33.5% |
| 12. West Virginia | 32.7% |
| 13. Villanova | 32.2% |
| 14. USF | 31.3% |
| 15. St. John's | 30.2% |
| 16. Syracuse | 28.2% |
Turnover %
| 1. West Virginia | 15.1% |
| 2. Seton Hall | 16.2% |
| 3. Pittsburgh | 17.5% |
| 4. Marquette | 17.7% |
| 5. DePaul | 17.7% |
| 6. Louisville | 18.5% |
| 7. Connecticut | 18.7% |
| 8. Notre Dame | 19.2% |
| 9. USF | 20.2% |
| 10. Villanova | 20.6% |
| 11. Syracuse | 21% |
| 12. Georgetown | 21.1% |
| 13. Providence | 21.2% |
| 14. Cincinnati | 21.4% |
| 15. Rutgers | 22.3% |
| 16. St. John's | 23.4% |
Offensive Rebounding %
| 1. Pittsburgh | 36.1% |
| 2. Notre Dame | 34.1% |
| 3. Connecticut | 34.1% |
| 4. Syracuse | 33.7% |
| 5. Marquette | 32.1% |
| 6. Providence | 32% |
| 7. DePaul | 32% |
| 8. USF | 31.5% |
| 9. Villanova | 31.3% |
| 10. Cincinnati | 30.2% |
| 11. St. John's | 29.7% |
| 12. West Virginia | 29.4% |
| 13. Georgetown | 29% |
| 14. Louisville | 28.4% |
| 15. Seton Hall | 26.9% |
| 16. Rutgers | 24.6% |
Efficiency Margin
| 1. Louisville | 0.16 |
| 2. Georgetown | 0.13 |
| 3. Marquette | 0.1 |
| 4. West Virginia | 0.08 |
| 5. Notre Dame | 0.06 |
| 6. Connecticut | 0.06 |
| 7. Pittsburgh | 0.04 |
| 8. Syracuse | 0 |
| 9. Villanova | -0.01 |
| 10. Cincinnati | -0.01 |
| 11. Seton Hall | -0.06 |
| 12. Providence | -0.07 |
| 13. DePaul | -0.07 |
| 14. USF | -0.1 |
| 15. St. John's | -0.13 |
| 16. Rutgers | -0.19 |
Defensive Stats
Points per possession Allowed
| 1. Louisville | 0.9 |
| 2. Georgetown | 0.92 |
| 3. Marquette | 0.97 |
| 4. West Virginia | 0.98 |
| 5. Cincinnati | 1.01 |
| 6. St. John's | 1.01 |
| 7. Syracuse | 1.02 |
| 8. Villanova | 1.02 |
| 9. Connecticut | 1.03 |
| 10. Notre Dame | 1.04 |
| 11. Pittsburgh | 1.04 |
| 12. Rutgers | 1.07 |
| 13. DePaul | 1.09 |
| 14. Providence | 1.1 |
| 15. Seton Hall | 1.1 |
| 16. USF | 1.11 |
Effective Shooting % Allowed
| 1. Georgetown | 42% |
| 2. Louisville | 43% |
| 3. Connecticut | 46.1% |
| 4. Cincinnati | 46.7% |
| 5. Marquette | 46.9% |
| 6. Notre Dame | 47.3% |
| 7. Syracuse | 48.6% |
| 8. Pittsburgh | 49.2% |
| 9. West Virginia | 49.5% |
| 10. Villanova | 50.1% |
| 11. Providence | 50.2% |
| 12. USF | 50.9% |
| 13. Rutgers | 51.3% |
| 14. Seton Hall | 51.4% |
| 15. St. John's | 51.7% |
| 16. DePaul | 52.6% |
2-pt Shooting % Allowed
| 1. Connecticut | 40.7% |
| 2. Georgetown | 41.1% |
| 3. Louisville | 42% |
| 4. Notre Dame | 46% |
| 5. West Virginia | 47.2% |
| 6. Seton Hall | 47.6% |
| 7. Rutgers | 48.2% |
| 8. Marquette | 48.4% |
| 9. Cincinnati | 48.4% |
| 10. USF | 48.4% |
| 11. Syracuse | 48.6% |
| 12. Pittsburgh | 48.8% |
| 13. Villanova | 48.9% |
| 14. Providence | 49.5% |
| 15. St. John's | 51% |
| 16. DePaul | 52.4% |
3-pt Shooting % Allowed
| 1. Marquette | 29.1% |
| 2. Georgetown | 29.2% |
| 3. Cincinnati | 29.2% |
| 4. Louisville | 30% |
| 5. Syracuse | 32.4% |
| 6. Notre Dame | 33.1% |
| 7. Pittsburgh | 33.2% |
| 8. Providence | 34.6% |
| 9. Villanova | 34.9% |
| 10. DePaul | 35.3% |
| 11. St. John's | 35.6% |
| 12. West Virginia | 36% |
| 13. Connecticut | 37.9% |
| 14. USF | 38.1% |
| 15. Seton Hall | 39.2% |
| 16. Rutgers | 39.3% |
Turnover % Forced
| 1. Marquette | 24% |
| 2. Villanova | 22.6% |
| 3. West Virginia | 22.4% |
| 4. St. John's | 20.7% |
| 5. Georgetown | 20.6% |
| 6. Louisville | 20.2% |
| 7. DePaul | 20.1% |
| 8. Providence | 19.5% |
| 9. Pittsburgh | 19.4% |
| 10. Syracuse | 19% |
| 11. Seton Hall | 19% |
| 12. Cincinnati | 18.1% |
| 13. Rutgers | 17.6% |
| 14. Notre Dame | 16.3% |
| 15. USF | 16.2% |
| 16. Connecticut | 15.9% |
Defensive Rebounding %
| 1. Cincinnati | 81.3% |
| 2. St. John's | 81.1% |
| 3. West Virginia | 77.9% |
| 4. Louisville | 76.9% |
| 5. Villanova | 75.9% |
| 6. Syracuse | 75.5% |
| 7. Rutgers | 74.1% |
| 8. Georgetown | 73.1% |
| 9. USF | 72% |
| 10. Notre Dame | 71.8% |
| 11. Marquette | 70.1% |
| 12. Pittsburgh | 69.7% |
| 13. Connecticut | 68.5% |
| 14. Seton Hall | 68.4% |
| 15. Providence | 68.1% |
| 16. DePaul | 67.9% |

No comments:
Post a Comment