Big East 2008 Tempo-free Stats
Through 2/27/08
2007 Stats
Offensive Stats
Tempo (possession per 40 minutes)
1. Notre Dame | 72.7 |
2. Syracuse | 69.7 |
3. Seton Hall | 69.6 |
4. Marquette | 69.3 |
5. Villanova | 69.1 |
6. Connecticut | 67.3 |
7. DePaul | 67.2 |
8. Louisville | 67.1 |
9. Rutgers | 66.9 |
10. Providence | 66.8 |
11. St. John's | 65.4 |
12. West Virginia | 64.6 |
13. Cincinnati | 64.3 |
14. USF | 63.8 |
15. Pittsburgh | 63.5 |
16. Georgetown | 62.8 |
Offensive Efficiency (points per possession)
1. Notre Dame | 1.1 |
2. Connecticut | 1.09 |
3. Pittsburgh | 1.08 |
4. Marquette | 1.07 |
5. Louisville | 1.06 |
6. West Virginia | 1.06 |
7. Georgetown | 1.05 |
8. Seton Hall | 1.04 |
9. Providence | 1.03 |
10. Syracuse | 1.02 |
11. DePaul | 1.02 |
12. Villanova | 1.01 |
13. USF | 1.01 |
14. Cincinnati | 0.99 |
15. St. John's | 0.88 |
16. Rutgers | 0.88 |
Effective FG %
1. Louisville | 52.3% |
2. Georgetown | 52.2% |
3. Providence | 50.6% |
4. Notre Dame | 50.3% |
5. Connecticut | 50.1% |
6. Marquette | 49.7% |
7. Pittsburgh | 49.3% |
8. Cincinnati | 48.6% |
9. Seton Hall | 48.3% |
10. USF | 48% |
11. Syracuse | 47.7% |
12. DePaul | 47.7% |
13. West Virginia | 47.6% |
14. Villanova | 46.7% |
15. Rutgers | 45.4% |
16. St. John's | 42.4% |
2-pt Shooting %
1. Louisville | 53.5% |
2. Georgetown | 52.7% |
3. Syracuse | 49.7% |
4. Connecticut | 49.7% |
5. Pittsburgh | 48.9% |
6. USF | 48.3% |
7. Providence | 47.1% |
8. Marquette | 47.1% |
9. Cincinnati | 47.1% |
10. West Virginia | 46.8% |
11. DePaul | 46% |
12. Villanova | 45.8% |
13. Notre Dame | 45.7% |
14. Seton Hall | 45% |
15. Rutgers | 42.4% |
16. St. John's | 41.3% |
3-pt Shooting %
1. Notre Dame | 40.1% |
2. Providence | 37.8% |
3. Marquette | 36.4% |
4. Seton Hall | 36.4% |
5. Georgetown | 34.3% |
6. Connecticut | 34.3% |
7. Cincinnati | 34.3% |
8. DePaul | 34.1% |
9. Rutgers | 34.1% |
10. Louisville | 33.5% |
11. Pittsburgh | 33.5% |
12. West Virginia | 32.7% |
13. Villanova | 32.2% |
14. USF | 31.3% |
15. St. John's | 30.2% |
16. Syracuse | 28.2% |
Turnover %
1. West Virginia | 15.1% |
2. Seton Hall | 16.2% |
3. Pittsburgh | 17.5% |
4. Marquette | 17.7% |
5. DePaul | 17.7% |
6. Louisville | 18.5% |
7. Connecticut | 18.7% |
8. Notre Dame | 19.2% |
9. USF | 20.2% |
10. Villanova | 20.6% |
11. Syracuse | 21% |
12. Georgetown | 21.1% |
13. Providence | 21.2% |
14. Cincinnati | 21.4% |
15. Rutgers | 22.3% |
16. St. John's | 23.4% |
Offensive Rebounding %
1. Pittsburgh | 36.1% |
2. Notre Dame | 34.1% |
3. Connecticut | 34.1% |
4. Syracuse | 33.7% |
5. Marquette | 32.1% |
6. Providence | 32% |
7. DePaul | 32% |
8. USF | 31.5% |
9. Villanova | 31.3% |
10. Cincinnati | 30.2% |
11. St. John's | 29.7% |
12. West Virginia | 29.4% |
13. Georgetown | 29% |
14. Louisville | 28.4% |
15. Seton Hall | 26.9% |
16. Rutgers | 24.6% |
Efficiency Margin
1. Louisville | 0.16 |
2. Georgetown | 0.13 |
3. Marquette | 0.1 |
4. West Virginia | 0.08 |
5. Notre Dame | 0.06 |
6. Connecticut | 0.06 |
7. Pittsburgh | 0.04 |
8. Syracuse | 0 |
9. Villanova | -0.01 |
10. Cincinnati | -0.01 |
11. Seton Hall | -0.06 |
12. Providence | -0.07 |
13. DePaul | -0.07 |
14. USF | -0.1 |
15. St. John's | -0.13 |
16. Rutgers | -0.19 |
Defensive Stats
Points per possession Allowed
1. Louisville | 0.9 |
2. Georgetown | 0.92 |
3. Marquette | 0.97 |
4. West Virginia | 0.98 |
5. Cincinnati | 1.01 |
6. St. John's | 1.01 |
7. Syracuse | 1.02 |
8. Villanova | 1.02 |
9. Connecticut | 1.03 |
10. Notre Dame | 1.04 |
11. Pittsburgh | 1.04 |
12. Rutgers | 1.07 |
13. DePaul | 1.09 |
14. Providence | 1.1 |
15. Seton Hall | 1.1 |
16. USF | 1.11 |
Effective Shooting % Allowed
1. Georgetown | 42% |
2. Louisville | 43% |
3. Connecticut | 46.1% |
4. Cincinnati | 46.7% |
5. Marquette | 46.9% |
6. Notre Dame | 47.3% |
7. Syracuse | 48.6% |
8. Pittsburgh | 49.2% |
9. West Virginia | 49.5% |
10. Villanova | 50.1% |
11. Providence | 50.2% |
12. USF | 50.9% |
13. Rutgers | 51.3% |
14. Seton Hall | 51.4% |
15. St. John's | 51.7% |
16. DePaul | 52.6% |
2-pt Shooting % Allowed
1. Connecticut | 40.7% |
2. Georgetown | 41.1% |
3. Louisville | 42% |
4. Notre Dame | 46% |
5. West Virginia | 47.2% |
6. Seton Hall | 47.6% |
7. Rutgers | 48.2% |
8. Marquette | 48.4% |
9. Cincinnati | 48.4% |
10. USF | 48.4% |
11. Syracuse | 48.6% |
12. Pittsburgh | 48.8% |
13. Villanova | 48.9% |
14. Providence | 49.5% |
15. St. John's | 51% |
16. DePaul | 52.4% |
3-pt Shooting % Allowed
1. Marquette | 29.1% |
2. Georgetown | 29.2% |
3. Cincinnati | 29.2% |
4. Louisville | 30% |
5. Syracuse | 32.4% |
6. Notre Dame | 33.1% |
7. Pittsburgh | 33.2% |
8. Providence | 34.6% |
9. Villanova | 34.9% |
10. DePaul | 35.3% |
11. St. John's | 35.6% |
12. West Virginia | 36% |
13. Connecticut | 37.9% |
14. USF | 38.1% |
15. Seton Hall | 39.2% |
16. Rutgers | 39.3% |
Turnover % Forced
1. Marquette | 24% |
2. Villanova | 22.6% |
3. West Virginia | 22.4% |
4. St. John's | 20.7% |
5. Georgetown | 20.6% |
6. Louisville | 20.2% |
7. DePaul | 20.1% |
8. Providence | 19.5% |
9. Pittsburgh | 19.4% |
10. Syracuse | 19% |
11. Seton Hall | 19% |
12. Cincinnati | 18.1% |
13. Rutgers | 17.6% |
14. Notre Dame | 16.3% |
15. USF | 16.2% |
16. Connecticut | 15.9% |
Defensive Rebounding %
1. Cincinnati | 81.3% |
2. St. John's | 81.1% |
3. West Virginia | 77.9% |
4. Louisville | 76.9% |
5. Villanova | 75.9% |
6. Syracuse | 75.5% |
7. Rutgers | 74.1% |
8. Georgetown | 73.1% |
9. USF | 72% |
10. Notre Dame | 71.8% |
11. Marquette | 70.1% |
12. Pittsburgh | 69.7% |
13. Connecticut | 68.5% |
14. Seton Hall | 68.4% |
15. Providence | 68.1% |
16. DePaul | 67.9% |
No comments:
Post a Comment