Jan 24, 2008

2008 Pac 10 Tempo-Free Stats

Well, sorry about that. Now that I've returned, I can start posting again. Since we're almost a month into the conference season, time for the first posting of the 2008 Conference Tempo-Free Stats.
The Pac10 (my current residence) have been updated first. The rest will soon follow. If some number looks fishy, please let me know. I had to dust off my program, and so something may have been miscalculated.

Once again, thank you to the conference sites for posting usable data formats and to KenPom and Wonk (now at BBall Prospectus) for initiating this trend into tempo-free wilderness.

Pac 10 2008 Stats
Through 2/27/2008

2007 Stats


Offensive Stats

Tempo (possession per 40 minutes)

1. California67.8
2. Washington67.6
3. Oregon State65.9
4. USC65.4
5. UCLA64.9
6. Arizona63.6
7. Oregon63.6
8. Stanford63.1
9. Arizona State62.8
10. Washington State58.6


Offensive Efficiency (points per possession)

1. UCLA1.13
2. Oregon1.11
3. Arizona1.08
4. California1.08
5. Washington State1.08
6. USC1.06
7. Stanford1.05
8. Washington1.01
9. Arizona State1
10. Oregon State0.87


Effective FG %

1. Oregon55.3%
2. USC54.7%
3. Arizona53.1%
4. Washington State52.8%
5. UCLA52%
6. Arizona State51.1%
7. California50.7%
8. Washington47.4%
9. Stanford46.5%
10. Oregon State40.2%


2-pt Shooting %

1. USC54%
2. UCLA52.6%
3. Arizona State52.1%
4. Oregon51.9%
5. Arizona50.7%
6. Washington State49.8%
7. California49.2%
8. Washington47.5%
9. Stanford45%
10. Oregon State39%


3-pt Shooting %

1. Oregon39.9%
2. Washington State38.9%
3. Arizona38.3%
4. USC37.6%
5. California36.1%
6. Stanford34%
7. UCLA33.5%
8. Arizona State33.2%
9. Washington31.6%
10. Oregon State28.5%


Turnover %

1. Washington State16.2%
2. Arizona17.5%
3. Oregon State18%
4. California18.1%
5. Oregon18.5%
6. Stanford18.5%
7. UCLA18.9%
8. Washington19.4%
9. Arizona State20.6%
10. USC21.2%


Offensive Rebounding %

1. Washington37%
2. Stanford36.5%
3. UCLA36.5%
4. California29.6%
5. USC28.4%
6. Oregon State28.2%
7. Oregon27.7%
8. Washington State24.7%
9. Arizona24.3%
10. Arizona State22.7%


Efficiency Margin

1. UCLA0.17
2. Stanford0.08
3. Washington State0.08
4. USC0.05
5. Arizona0.03
6. Oregon0.01
7. Washington-0.02
8. Arizona State-0.02
9. California-0.06
10. Oregon State-0.3



Defensive Stats

Points per possession Allowed

1. UCLA0.96
2. Stanford0.97
3. USC1.01
4. Washington State1.01
5. Arizona State1.02
6. Washington1.03
7. Arizona1.05
8. Oregon1.1
9. California1.14
10. Oregon State1.17


Effective Shooting % Allowed

1. Stanford43.9%
2. USC45.5%
3. Arizona State49.4%
4. UCLA49.6%
5. Washington50.3%
6. Washington State50.7%
7. Arizona51.5%
8. Oregon51.7%
9. California53.9%
10. Oregon State55.6%


2-pt Shooting % Allowed

1. Stanford42.4%
2. USC43.7%
3. Arizona State47.5%
4. UCLA47.6%
5. Washington47.9%
6. Washington State50.3%
7. Arizona50.9%
8. Oregon52%
9. California53.6%
10. Oregon State54.4%


3-pt Shooting % Allowed

1. Stanford32.3%
2. USC32.8%
3. Oregon34.1%
4. Washington State34.5%
5. Arizona State35%
6. Arizona35.3%
7. California36.2%
8. Washington36.7%
9. UCLA37%
10. Oregon State38.9%


Turnover % Forced

1. Washington State22%
2. UCLA21.2%
3. Arizona State20.2%
4. Washington20%
5. Arizona19.7%
6. Oregon State19%
7. USC18.2%
8. Stanford16.9%
9. Oregon15.6%
10. California14.8%


Defensive Rebounding %

1. UCLA79.3%
2. Washington77%
3. California76.7%
4. Washington State74.1%
5. Stanford74%
6. Arizona State73%
7. Oregon72.8%
8. Oregon State72%
9. Arizona71.3%
10. USC65.9%

No comments: