2006 Big East Tempo Free Stats
2006, year of the Beast!! Big East 2006 Tempo Free Stats
Tempo (possession per 40 minutes)
| 1. Syracuse | 69.8 |
| 2. Marquette | 69.3 |
| 3. Connecticut | 68.8 |
| 4. Providence | 68 |
| 5. Pittsburgh | 67.7 |
| 6. Villanova | 67.2 |
| 7. Cincinnati | 67.2 |
| 8. Seton Hall | 66.5 |
| 9. Louisville | 66.2 |
| 10. Notre Dame | 65.3 |
| 11. Rutgers | 65.1 |
| 12. St. John's | 64.2 |
| 13. West Virginia | 63.6 |
| 14. USF | 62.5 |
| 15. DePaul | 62 |
| 16. Georgetown | 58.5 |
Offensive Efficiency (points per possession)
| 1. Notre Dame | 1.15 |
| 2. West Virginia | 1.1 |
| 3. Villanova | 1.1 |
| 4. Georgetown | 1.1 |
| 5. Connecticut | 1.1 |
| 6. Marquette | 1.07 |
| 7. Pittsburgh | 1.06 |
| 8. Rutgers | 1.05 |
| 9. Providence | 1.04 |
| 10. Seton Hall | 1.04 |
| 11. DePaul | 1.04 |
| 12. Cincinnati | 1.01 |
| 13. Syracuse | 0.99 |
| 14. Louisville | 0.99 |
| 15. St. John's | 0.91 |
| 16. USF | 0.9 |
Effective FG %
| 1. Notre Dame | 53.1% |
| 2. Marquette | 52.8% |
| 3. West Virginia | 52.7% |
| 4. Georgetown | 52.4% |
| 5. Pittsburgh | 51.2% |
| 6. Connecticut | 50.6% |
| 7. DePaul | 48.7% |
| 8. Rutgers | 48.5% |
| 9. Providence | 48.2% |
| 10. Syracuse | 48.2% |
| 11. Villanova | 48% |
| 12. Seton Hall | 47.7% |
| 13. Louisville | 46.6% |
| 14. Cincinnati | 44.9% |
| 15. St. John's | 44.6% |
| 16. USF | 44.6% |
2-pt Shooting %
| 1. West Virginia | 54.9% |
| 2. Georgetown | 52.1% |
| 3. Pittsburgh | 50.6% |
| 4. Connecticut | 50.6% |
| 5. DePaul | 49.1% |
| 6. Syracuse | 48.7% |
| 7. Marquette | 47.4% |
| 8. Providence | 47.1% |
| 9. Notre Dame | 46.4% |
| 10. Seton Hall | 45.9% |
| 11. St. John's | 45.5% |
| 12. Cincinnati | 44.3% |
| 13. Louisville | 43.9% |
| 14. USF | 43.6% |
| 15. Rutgers | 43.2% |
| 16. Villanova | 41.7% |
3-pt Shooting %
| 1. Marquette | 41.5% |
| 2. Notre Dame | 41.2% |
| 3. Villanova | 38.5% |
| 4. Rutgers | 38.5% |
| 5. Georgetown | 35.4% |
| 6. Pittsburgh | 35.1% |
| 7. Seton Hall | 34.5% |
| 8. Providence | 34% |
| 9. Connecticut | 33.9% |
| 10. West Virginia | 33.8% |
| 11. Louisville | 33.6% |
| 12. DePaul | 31.8% |
| 13. Syracuse | 31.5% |
| 14. USF | 31.2% |
| 15. Cincinnati | 31% |
| 16. St. John's | 27.8% |
Turnover %
| 1. West Virginia | 11.9% |
| 2. Notre Dame | 16% |
| 3. Villanova | 16.5% |
| 4. Cincinnati | 16.8% |
| 5. Seton Hall | 17.4% |
| 6. Rutgers | 17.4% |
| 7. DePaul | 17.7% |
| 8. Louisville | 19.5% |
| 9. Georgetown | 19.8% |
| 10. Marquette | 20.2% |
| 11. Pittsburgh | 20.3% |
| 12. Providence | 20.6% |
| 13. Connecticut | 20.6% |
| 14. Syracuse | 21.3% |
| 15. USF | 24.7% |
| 16. St. John's | 25.4% |
Offensive Rebounding %
| 1. Connecticut | 42.2% |
| 2. Providence | 37.1% |
| 3. St. John's | 34.4% |
| 4. Georgetown | 34.2% |
| 5. Syracuse | 33.5% |
| 6. Pittsburgh | 33.3% |
| 7. Cincinnati | 33.3% |
| 8. Villanova | 33.1% |
| 9. DePaul | 31.9% |
| 10. Notre Dame | 31.5% |
| 11. USF | 31.2% |
| 12. Marquette | 30.9% |
| 13. Seton Hall | 29.7% |
| 14. Louisville | 28.5% |
| 15. Rutgers | 27.3% |
| 16. West Virginia | 20.7% |
Efficiency Margin
| 1. Connecticut | 0.14 |
| 2. Villanova | 0.08 |
| 3. Georgetown | 0.08 |
| 4. West Virginia | 0.06 |
| 5. Pittsburgh | 0.06 |
| 6. Notre Dame | 0.03 |
| 7. Marquette | 0.03 |
| 8. Rutgers | -0.01 |
| 9. Seton Hall | -0.03 |
| 10. Louisville | -0.03 |
| 11. Cincinnati | -0.03 |
| 12. DePaul | -0.04 |
| 13. Providence | -0.06 |
| 14. Syracuse | -0.07 |
| 15. St. John's | -0.09 |
| 16. USF | -0.14 |
Defensive Numbers
Points per possession Allowed
| 1. Connecticut | 0.96 |
| 2. Pittsburgh | 1 |
| 3. St. John's | 1 |
| 4. Louisville | 1.02 |
| 5. Villanova | 1.02 |
| 6. Georgetown | 1.02 |
| 7. West Virginia | 1.03 |
| 8. Marquette | 1.04 |
| 9. Cincinnati | 1.04 |
| 10. USF | 1.04 |
| 11. Rutgers | 1.06 |
| 12. Syracuse | 1.07 |
| 13. Seton Hall | 1.07 |
| 14. DePaul | 1.08 |
| 15. Providence | 1.09 |
| 16. Notre Dame | 1.12 |
Effective Shooting % Allowed
| 1. Connecticut | 42.3% |
| 2. St. John's | 47.4% |
| 3. Marquette | 47.5% |
| 4. USF | 47.7% |
| 5. Pittsburgh | 48% |
| 6. Louisville | 48.2% |
| 7. Cincinnati | 48.4% |
| 8. Georgetown | 48.6% |
| 9. Rutgers | 48.7% |
| 10. DePaul | 49.9% |
| 11. Providence | 50.3% |
| 12. Notre Dame | 50.6% |
| 13. Syracuse | 51% |
| 14. Seton Hall | 51.4% |
| 15. Villanova | 51.8% |
| 16. West Virginia | 52.9% |
2-pt Shooting % Allowed
| 1. Connecticut | 40.7% |
| 2. Cincinnati | 44.9% |
| 3. Louisville | 45.8% |
| 4. Marquette | 46.5% |
| 5. Pittsburgh | 46.6% |
| 6. USF | 46.6% |
| 7. St. John's | 46.9% |
| 8. Syracuse | 47% |
| 9. Providence | 47.1% |
| 10. Notre Dame | 47.1% |
| 11. Rutgers | 47.6% |
| 12. DePaul | 47.9% |
| 13. Villanova | 48.2% |
| 14. Georgetown | 49.4% |
| 15. Seton Hall | 50.3% |
| 16. West Virginia | 52.5% |
3-pt Shooting % Allowed
| 1. Connecticut | 30.2% |
| 2. Georgetown | 31.5% |
| 3. St. John's | 32.2% |
| 4. Marquette | 32.7% |
| 5. USF | 33.3% |
| 6. Pittsburgh | 33.6% |
| 7. Rutgers | 34.1% |
| 8. Louisville | 35% |
| 9. Seton Hall | 35.6% |
| 10. West Virginia | 35.9% |
| 11. DePaul | 35.9% |
| 12. Cincinnati | 36.7% |
| 13. Providence | 37.8% |
| 14. Notre Dame | 38.3% |
| 15. Syracuse | 38.6% |
| 16. Villanova | 39.6% |
Turnover % Forced
| 1. West Virginia | 23.6% |
| 2. Villanova | 23.4% |
| 3. Louisville | 21.1% |
| 4. Syracuse | 20.9% |
| 5. Seton Hall | 20.5% |
| 6. Georgetown | 19.8% |
| 7. Cincinnati | 19.3% |
| 8. Providence | 18.8% |
| 9. St. John's | 18.7% |
| 10. Marquette | 18.6% |
| 11. USF | 18.5% |
| 12. Rutgers | 18.1% |
| 13. Pittsburgh | 17.6% |
| 14. DePaul | 17.2% |
| 15. Connecticut | 16.4% |
| 16. Notre Dame | 13.9% |
Defensive Rebounding %
| 1. St. John's | 76.4% |
| 2. Pittsburgh | 75% |
| 3. Villanova | 74.8% |
| 4. Rutgers | 73.9% |
| 5. Notre Dame | 73.1% |
| 6. Seton Hall | 72.2% |
| 7. Louisville | 72.1% |
| 8. Georgetown | 72.1% |
| 9. USF | 70.9% |
| 10. Syracuse | 70.6% |
| 11. Cincinnati | 68.9% |
| 12. Connecticut | 68.5% |
| 13. DePaul | 68.4% |
| 14. Marquette | 68.1% |
| 15. Providence | 67.5% |
| 16. West Virginia | 67.2% |

No comments:
Post a Comment