2006 Numbers Now Up

While we're at it, let's add 2006 numbers so that we can compare some vast (see Wazzu and Oregon) improvements or declines after the first two weekends of play.

2006 Pac 10 Tempo Free Offensive Stats

Pace (Possessions/40 minutes)

1. Arizona	70
2. Washington	69
3. USC	68
4. Oregon State	66
5. Arizona State	65
6. Stanford	65
7. UCLA	64
8. Oregon	62
9. California	62
10. Washington State	61

Offensive Efficiency (Points per possession)

1. Washington	1.1
2. Oregon	1.06
3. UCLA	1.06
4. Arizona	1.03
5. California	1.02
6. Stanford	1.01
7. USC	0.99
8. Oregon State	0.97
9. Arizona State	0.97
10. Washington State	0.9

Effective FG %

1. UCLA	53%
2. Washington	51.2%
3. Oregon	51.1%
4. Oregon State	49.6%
5. Arizona	48.9%
6. USC	48.4%
7. California	48.1%
8. Arizona State	47.7%
9. Stanford	47.2%
10. Washington State	45%

2-pt Shooting %

1. UCLA	54.1%
2. Oregon	52.7%
3. Arizona	48.8%
4. Washington	48.5%
5. Oregon State	47.2%
6. California	45.5%
7. USC	45.2%
8. Arizona State	45.1%
9. Stanford	44.8%
10. Washington State	44.5%

3-pt Shooting %

1. Washington	38%
2. Oregon State	36.9%
3. California	36.7%
4. Arizona State	36.1%
5. Stanford	35.9%
6. USC	35.9%
7. UCLA	34.2%
8. Arizona	33%
9. Oregon	32.3%
10. Washington State	30.9%

Turnover %

1. California	18.7%
2. USC	19%
3. Arizona	19.2%
4. Oregon	19.6%
5. Washington	20.2%
6. Washington State	21.2%
7. Stanford	21.6%
8. Arizona State	21.9%
9. UCLA	22.6%
10. Oregon State	23.7%

Offensive Rebounding %

1. Washington	38.9%
2. Arizona	33%
3. Oregon	32.8%
4. UCLA	32.3%
5. Stanford	30.8%
6. Arizona State	30.3%
7. Oregon State	27.7%
8. California	27.1%
9. Washington State	25.8%
10. USC	25%

Defense Numbers

Defensive Efficiency (points per possession)

1. UCLA	0.93
2. Washington State	0.97
3. California	0.97
4. Arizona	0.99
5. Washington	0.99
6. Stanford	1.01
7. USC	1.03
8. Oregon	1.05
9. Oregon State	1.07
10. Arizona State	1.09

Efficieny margin

1. UCLA	0.13
2. Washington	0.11
3. California	0.05
4. Arizona	0.04
5. Oregon	0.01
6. Stanford	0
7. USC	-0.05
8. Washington State	-0.07
9. Oregon State	-0.1
10. Arizona State	-0.12

Defensive Effective FG %

1. Washington State	45.5%
2. UCLA	46.8%
3. California	47.3%
4. Stanford	47.5%
5. Oregon State	48.4%
6. Washington	49.5%
7. Arizona State	50.4%
8. Oregon	50.5%
9. Arizona	51.8%
10. USC	52.7%

Opponent 2-pt Shooting %

1. Washington State	45.1%
2. Stanford	46.8%
3. Oregon State	48%
4. UCLA	45.5%
5. Washington	48.7%
6. California	44.8%
7. Arizona	50.4%
8. Oregon	48.2%
9. Arizona State	47.4%
10. USC	50.5%

Opponent 3-pt Shooting %

1. Washington State	31%
2. Stanford	32.8%
3. Oregon State	32.9%
4. UCLA	33.8%
5. Washington	34.2%
6. California	35%
7. Arizona	36.5%
8. Oregon	38.1%
9. Arizona State	38.1%
10. USC	38.2%

Forced Turnover %

1. Arizona	25.6%
2. Washington	22.5%
3. USC	22.4%
4. UCLA	22.3%
5. California	20.1%
6. Washington State	20%
7. Arizona State	19.5%
8. Stanford	18.9%
9. Oregon	17.8%
10. Oregon State	17.6%

Defensive Rebounding %

1. USC	75%
2. Washington State	74.2%
3. California	72.9%
4. Oregon State	72.3%
5. Arizona State	69.7%
6. Stanford	69.2%
7. UCLA	67.7%
8. Oregon	67.2%
9. Arizona	67%
10. Washington	61.1%